AJGP
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ALL ISSUES SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a Colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Molinari, V.
Right arrow Articles by Rifai, A. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Molinari, V.
Right arrow Articles by Rifai, A. H.
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 6:136-144, May 1998
© 1998 American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry


Regular Article

The Relationship Between Patient, Informant, Social Worker, and Consensus Diagnoses of Personality Disorder in Elderly Depressed Inpatients

Victor Molinari, Ph.D., Mark E. Kunik, M.D., Benoit Mulsant, M.D., and A. Hind Rifai, M.D.

Received June 7, 1996; revised January 24, 1997; accepted September 3, 1997. From the Houston Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Baylor College of Medicine; Houston, Texas. Address correspondence to Dr. Molinari, Director, Geropsychology, Houston Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Psychology Service 116B, 2002 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030.

Two psychiatrists simultaneously administered the Personality Assessment Form (PAF) to 20 depressed geropsychiatric inpatients and to 20 of their relatives (informants). A social worker also completed PAF ratings, and a consensus conference independently assigned an Axis II diagnosis. For patient interviews, categorical and dimensional interrater reliability indices for cluster and total personality disorders (PDs) were generally marginal. For informant interviews, categorical interrater reliability indices for cluster and total PDs were also marginal, but dimensional reliability was high. Consistent with previous research, agreement between categorical scores yielded by the four assessment methods was poor, but agreement between dimensional scores was generally better. It appears that patients, family members, and staff maintain different perspectives on patients' personality that, if overlapping, may provide useful diagnostic data.

Key Words: Geriatric Depression • Personality Disorder • Consensus Diagnosis




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. PsychiatryHome page
M. Zimmerman, L. Rothschild, and I. Chelminski
The Prevalence of DSM-IV Personality Disorders in Psychiatric Outpatients
Am J Psychiatry, October 1, 2005; 162(10): 1911 - 1918.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AJGPHome page
J. Q. Morse, P. A. Pilkonis, P. R. Houck, E. Frank, and C. F. Reynolds III
Impact of Cluster C Personality Disorders on Outcomes of Acute and Maintenance Treatment in Late-Life Depression
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry, September 1, 2005; 13(9): 808 - 814.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ALL ISSUES SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry