AJGP
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ALL ISSUES SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 16:706-717, September 2008
© 2008 American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a Colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Walsh, P. G.
Right arrow Articles by Friedman, B.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Walsh, P. G.
Right arrow Articles by Friedman, B.

Clinical Review

Psychiatric Emergency Services for the U.S. Elderly: 2008 and Beyond

Patrick G. Walsh, B.S., Glenn Currier, M.D., Manish N. Shah, M.D., Jeffrey M. Lyness, M.D., and Bruce Friedman, Ph.D.

From the Departments of Psychiatry (PGW, GC, JML, BF), Emergency Medicine (MNS), and Community and Preventive Medicine (MNS, BF), University of Rochester, NY.

In 2011 the oldest baby boomers will turn age 65. Although healthcare researchers have started to examine the future preparedness of the healthcare system for the elderly, psychiatric emergency services (PES) have been widely overlooked. Research is needed to address PES need and demand by older patients, assess the consequences of this need or demand, and establish recommendations to guide PES planning and practice. The authors examined journal articles, review articles, textbooks, and electronic databases related to these topics. The authors outline the current PES environment in terms of facilities, characteristics, and visits, and discuss current geriatric patient PES use. Factors expected to impact future use are examined, including sociodemographic characteristics, psychiatric illness prevalence, cohort effects, medical comorbidity, mental healthcare resources and utilization, and stigma. Consequences of these on future psychiatric care and well-being of the elderly are then explored, specifically, greater acute services need, more suicide, strained delivery systems, increased hospitalization, and greater costs. The following are proposed to address likely future PES shortcomings: enhance service delivery, increase training, standardize and improve PES, prioritize finances, and promote research. The degree to which the geriatric mental healthcare "crisis" develops will be inversely related to the current system’s response to predictable future needs.

Key Words: Aged • psychiatric • emergency department







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ALL ISSUES SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry