|
|
||||||||
Regular Research Articles |
From the Aging Research Center, Karolinska Institutet and Stockholm Gerontology Research Center, Stockholm.
Objective: In a previous study, the authors found no accelerated decline in close proximity to death for a measure of global cognitive functioning, after excluding persons in a preclinical phase of dementia. However, specific cognitive tasks might be more sensitive to terminal-decline effects. The purpose of this study was to explore possible terminal-decline effects for a range of cognitive tasks after controlling for preclinical dementia.
Design: Community-based cohort study.
Setting: The Kungsholmen district of Stockholm.
Participants: A total of 585 persons (75+ years) were repeatedly assessed over an 11-year period. Level and change in cognitive performance were compared for three groups: persons in close proximity to death, persons in a preclinical phase of dementia, and persons who remained alive and nondemented throughout the study.
Measurements: Tasks assessing primary and episodic memory, verbal ability, and visuospatial skill.
Results: Compared with an analysis where all dead subjects were included in the impending-death group, removing the preclinical dementia cases resulted in markedly attenuated mortality-related effects. However, the impending-death group still declined at a faster rate relative to the comparison group on Digit Span-forward, word recognition, and category fluency. Notably, these were tasks for which the comparison group showed no significant decline.
Conclusions: A considerable proportion of the terminal-decline effect is accounted for by the impact of preclinical dementia. However, for tasks that are relatively resistant to age-related change, such effects might be detected independently of preclinical dementia.
Key Words: Aging cognition longitudinal studies preclinical dementia impending death
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Ganguli and R. C. Petersen Mild Cognitive Impairment: Challenging Issues Am J Geriatr Psychiatry, May 1, 2008; 16(5): 339 - 342. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ALL ISSUES | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |