AJGP
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ALL ISSUES SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 16:293-299, April 2008
© 2008 American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a Colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Algase, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Beel-Bates, C. A.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Algase, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Beel-Bates, C. A.

Regular Research Articles

Are Wandering and Physically Nonaggressive Agitation Equivalent?

Donna L. Algase, Ph.D., R.N., F.A.A.N., F.G.S.A., Cathy Antonakos, Ph.D., Lan Yao, Ph.D., R.N., Elizabeth R. A. Beattie, Ph.D., R.N., Gwi-Ryung Son Hong, Ph.D., R.N., and Cynthia A. Beel-Bates, R.N., Ph.D.

From the University of Michigan School of Nursing (DLA, CA, LY, ERAB, CAB-B), Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea (G-RSH), Cynthia A.

Objective: The authors examined equivalence of wandering and physically nonaggressive agitation (PNA) as concepts.

Design: A cross-sectional correlational design was used.

Setting: Participants were recruited from 22 nursing homes and 6 assisted living facilities in two states.

Participants: Ambulatory residents meeting DSM-IV criteria for dementia (N = 181) were studied.

Measurements: Video-tapes for up to twelve 20-minute observations per participant were coded for wandering using an empirically derived taxonomy of ambulation patterns. Separate raters coded the same tapes for six PNA behaviors on the agitation behavior mapping instrument.

Results: Most participants (73.5%) wandered; all showed PNA behaviors. Factor analyses yielded an one-factor solution for wandering (explained variance = 43.66%) and a two-factor solution for PNA (explained variance = 53.45%). Overall wandering correlated significantly with PNA Factor 1 (df =179, r = 0.68, p <0.001) and Factor 2, but at a lower value (df = 179, r = 0.26, p <0.01).

Conclusion: Findings depict wandering and PNA as overlapping, but nonequivalent phenomena. Evidence supporting construct validity of wandering was more robust than that for PNA. Results have implications for accuracy in scientific and clinical detection and labeling of wandering and agitation.

Key Words: Dementia • wandering • agitation • validity • observational methods







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ALL ISSUES SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry