AJGP
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ALL ISSUES SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 14:84-90, January 2006
© 2006 American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a Colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Holley, C.
Right arrow Articles by Mast, B. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Holley, C.
Right arrow Articles by Mast, B. T.

Regular Research Articles

Psychosocial and Vascular Risk Factors for Depression in the Elderly

Caitlin Holley, B.A., Stanley A. Murrell, Ph.D., and Benjamin T. Mast, Ph.D.

From the Departments of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky.

Objective: The objective of this study was to examine two competing hypotheses as they relate to the relationship between vascular and psychosocial risk factors for late-life depression. The stress–vulnerability hypothesis predicts that the depressogenic effect of psychosocial risk is stronger in the presence of cardiovascular risk factors (CVRFs). The other predicts that psychosocial risk factors and vascular risk factors are independent pathways to depression and that there is no combined effect of vascular risk factors and life stress.

Method: This study consisted of a longitudinal design (baseline, six-, and 12-month follow-up) predicting new episodes of significant depressive symptoms (CES-D >16) in 1,474 community-dwelling elders with low levels of depression at baseline (CES-D <8).

Results: There was a significant interaction between stress at wave 2 and CVRFs at baseline such that stress was a stronger predictor of wave 2 depression in participants who had two or more CVRFs. There was no evidence that CVRFs played a larger role in depression not preceded by a stressful life event than in depression that was preceded by a stressful life event.

Conclusions: The depressogenic effect of stress was stronger in the presence of significant vascular risk (CVRFs). Vascular risk may increase one’s vulnerability to depression by exacerbating the impact of stress on depression. One hypothesis for this finding is that vascular disease disrupts mood regulation circuits in the brain, which decrease its ability to respond to stressful events.

Key Words: Late-life depression • psychosocial risk factors • vascular depression • cerebrovascular risk factors




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
AJGPHome page
C. K. Holley and B. T. Mast
The Effects of Widowhood and Vascular Risk Factors on Late-Life Depression
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry, August 1, 2007; 15(8): 690 - 698.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ALL ISSUES SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry