|
|
||||||||
Regular Research Articles |
From the Sam and Rose Stein Institute for Research on Aging and the Departments of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego, and VA San Diego Healthcare System.
Objective: There is no consensus on how to define successful aging. The authors sought to determine the correlates of self-rated successful aging as well as its correspondence with major researcher-defined criteria.
Methods: Participants were 205 community-dwelling adults over age 60. A questionnaire survey asked the participants to rate their own degree of successful aging and inquired about demographic characteristics, medical history, activity levels, resilience, daily functioning, and health-related quality of life (Medical Outcomes study 36-item Short-Form [MOS-SF-36]). Participants subjective ratings of successful aging were contrasted with sets of researcher-defined criteria, and correlates of subjectively rated successful aging were examined.
Results: Ninety-two percent of the participants rated themselves as aging successfully. A majority of them also met other research criteria for successful aging such as independent living, mastery/growth, and positive adaptation but not those requiring an absence of chronic medical illness or physical disability. Higher SF-36 scores as compared with a published sample indirectly corroborated participants subjectively rated successful aging. Subjective ratings of successful aging were significantly correlated with higher scores on health-related quality of life as well as resilience, greater activity, and number of close friends but not with several demographic characteristics.
Conclusion: Most community-dwelling older adults viewed themselves as aging successfully despite having chronic physical illnesses and some disability. Longitudinal studies of the reliability and validity of subjective ratings of successful aging are warranted.
Key Words: Successful aging resilience quality of life health disability
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Low, A. E. Molzahn, and M. Kalfoss Quality of Life of Older Adults in Canada and Norway: Examining the Iowa Model West J Nurs Res, June 1, 2008; 30(4): 458 - 476. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. V. Vahia and C. I. Cohen Psychosocial Interventions and Successful Aging: New Paradigms for Improving Outcome for Older Schizophrenia Patients? Am J Geriatr Psychiatry, December 1, 2007; 15(12): 987 - 990. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. E. Vaillant Aging Well Am J Geriatr Psychiatry, March 1, 2007; 15(3): 181 - 183. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Reichstadt, C. A. Depp, L. A. Palinkas, D. P. Folsom, and D. V. Jeste Building Blocks of Successful Aging: A Focus Group Study of Older Adults' Perceived Contributors to Successful Aging Am J Geriatr Psychiatry, March 1, 2007; 15(3): 194 - 201. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. G. Blazer Successful Aging Am J Geriatr Psychiatry, January 1, 2006; 14(1): 2 - 5. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Depp and D. V. Jeste Definitions and Predictors of Successful Aging: A Comprehensive Review of Larger Quantitative Studies Am J Geriatr Psychiatry, January 1, 2006; 14(1): 6 - 20. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ALL ISSUES | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |