|
|
||||||||
Special Article |
Received June 19, 2001; revised October 21, 2001; accepted November 27, 2001. From the independent consultant (RA); Ingenix, Basking Ridge, NJ (RH); Organon, Inc., West Orange, NJ (HS); Med Scriptor, Inc., Randolph, NJ (JD); and Forest Research Institute, Jersey City, NJ (SMG). Address correspondence to Dr. Ravi Anand, Consultant, Langegasse 53, 4104 Oberwit, SWITZERLAND. e-mail: ranand9872{at}aol.com
The authors conducted a comparative review of study designs and patient populations used in pivotal trials investigating various cholinesterase inhibitors (tacrine, donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine, controlled-release physostigmine, and metrifionate) and their impact on outcomes reported. Study design parameters that were investigated included patient selection, definitions of adverse dropouts and serious adverse events, effective doses used, dosing flexibility (fixed versus flexible), forced titration, and titration rate. Population characteristics included medical comorbidity and disease severity. Data suggest that differences in study designs and patient populations affect outcomes. Therefore, caution should be taken before making decisions on relative efficacy, safety, and tolerability, because clinical studies are not always directly comparable.
Key Words: Cholinesterase Inhibitors Alzheimer Disease Research Methods/Clinical Trials
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. D. Lebowitz Clinical Trials in Late Life: New Science in Old Paradigms Gerontologist, August 1, 2004; 44(4): 452 - 458. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ALL ISSUES | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |