AJGP
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ALL ISSUES SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a Colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schatzberg, A. F.
Right arrow Articles by The Mirtazapine vs. Paroxetine Study Group,
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schatzberg, A. F.
Right arrow Articles by The Mirtazapine vs. Paroxetine Study Group,
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 10:541-550, October 2002
© 2002 American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry


Regular Article

Double-Blind, Randomized Comparison of Mirtazapine and Paroxetine in Elderly Depressed Patients

Alan F. Schatzberg, M.D., Charlotte Kremer, M.D., Heidi E. Rodrigues, Greer M. Murphy Jr., M.D., Ph.D., and The Mirtazapine vs. Paroxetine Study Group

Received December 5, 2001; revised May 1, June 3, 2002; accepted June 19, 2002. From the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA (AFS,GMM), Organon Pharmaceuticals, Inc., West Orange, NJ (CK,HER), and The Mirtazapine vs. Paroxetine Study Group. Address correspondence to Dr. Schatzberg, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, 401 Quarry Road, Room 300, Stanford, CA 94305-5548.

OBJECTIVE: Authors studied the efficacy and tolerability of mirtazapine and paroxetine in elderly patients with major depression during an acute phase (8 weeks) and an extension phase (16 weeks). METHODS: Patients with major depression and without dementia, at least 65 years old, were eligible; they were randomized to mirtazapine or paroxetine once daily, with doses increasing over 42 days. Efficacy was assessed with the Ham-D and Clinical Global Impressions Scale, and tolerability was assessed from adverse events. RESULTS: Of 255 patients randomized, 126 on mirtazapine and 120 on paroxetine were included in the efficacy analysis. Differences favoring mirtazapine were observed for the mean change from baseline in Ham-D–17 score. Other significant differences were in the proportion of patients classified as responders (50% decrease from baseline Ham-D–17 scores) at Day 14 and in remission (Ham-D–17 score of 7 or less) at Day 42. The median time to response was 26 days in the mirtazapine group and 40 days in the paroxetine group. The mirtazapine group also showed more reduction in Ham-D Factor I (Anxiety/Somatization) and Factor VI (Sleep Disturbance) scores. Efficacy of both drugs was maintained during the extension phase. Patients on paroxetine were more likely to discontinue therapy in the acute phase because of adverse events. CONCLUSION: During the first weeks of treatment, antidepressant effects were more pronounced in the mirtazapine group, suggesting that mirtazapine has an earlier onset of action. Mirtazapine also demonstrated a better tolerability profile and represents a valuable option for the treatment of depression in elderly patients.

Key Words: Depression • Paroxetine • Mirtazapine




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
AJGPHome page
J. R. Sneed, B. R. Rutherford, D. Rindskopf, D. T. Lane, H. A. Sackeim, and S. P. Roose
Design Makes a Difference: A Meta-Analysis of Antidepressant Response Rates in Placebo-Controlled Versus Comparator Trials in Late-Life Depression
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry, January 1, 2008; 16(1): 65 - 73.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
K. S. Boockvar and D. E. Meier
Palliative care for frail older adults: "there are things I can't do anymore that I wish I could . . . ".
JAMA, November 8, 2006; 296(18): 2245 - 2253.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J PsychopharmacolHome page
G. M. Murphy Jr
Application of microarray technology in psychotropic drug trials.
J Psychopharmacol, July 1, 2006; 20(4 Suppl): 72 - 78.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
AJGPHome page
H. K. Gershenfeld, R. A. Philibert, and G. W. Boehm
Looking Forward in Geriatric Anxiety and Depression: Implications of Basic Science for the Future
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry, December 1, 2005; 13(12): 1027 - 1040.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
R. A. Hansen, G. Gartlehner, K. N. Lohr, B. N. Gaynes, and T. S. Carey
Efficacy and Safety of Second-Generation Antidepressants in the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder
Ann Intern Med, September 20, 2005; 143(6): 415 - 426.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Geriatr Psychiatry NeurolHome page
E. J. Lenze, J. F. Karp, B. H. Mulsant, S. Blank, M. K. Shear, P. R. Houck, and C. F. Reynolds
Somatic Symptoms in Late-Life Anxiety: Treatment Issues
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol, June 1, 2005; 18(2): 89 - 96.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
FocusHome page
A. F. Schatzberg
Recent Studies of the Biology and Treatment of Depression
Focus, January 1, 2005; 3(1): 14 - 24.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
FocusHome page
L. J. Fochtmann and A. J. Gelenberg
Guideline Watch: Practice Guideline for the Treatment of Patients With Major Depressive Disorder, 2nd Edition
Focus, January 1, 2005; 3(1): 34 - 42.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. PsychiatryHome page
S. P. Roose, H. A. Sackeim, K. R. R. Krishnan, B. G. Pollock, G. Alexopoulos, H. Lavretsky, I. R. Katz, H. Hakkarainen, and Old-Old Depression Study Group
Antidepressant Pharmacotherapy in the Treatment of Depression in the Very Old: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial
Am J Psychiatry, November 1, 2004; 161(11): 2050 - 2059.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Gen PsychiatryHome page
G. M. Murphy Jr, S. B. Hollander, H. E. Rodrigues, C. Kremer, and A. F. Schatzberg
Effects of the Serotonin Transporter Gene Promoter Polymorphism on Mirtazapine and Paroxetine Efficacy and Adverse Events in Geriatric Major Depression
Arch Gen Psychiatry, November 1, 2004; 61(11): 1163 - 1169.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. PsychiatryHome page
G. M. Murphy Jr., C. Kremer, H. E. Rodrigues, and A. F. Schatzberg
Pharmacogenetics of Antidepressant Medication Intolerance
Am J Psychiatry, October 1, 2003; 160(10): 1830 - 1835.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
M. B. Keller
Past, Present, and Future Directions for Defining Optimal Treatment Outcome in Depression: Remission and Beyond
JAMA, June 18, 2003; 289(23): 3152 - 3160.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AJGPHome page
B. S. Meyers
Treatment and Course of Geriatric Depression: Questions Raised by an Evolving Clinical Science
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry, October 1, 2002; 10(5): 497 - 502.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AJGPHome page
S. P. Roose and H. A. Sackeim
Clinical Trials in Late-Life Depression: Revisited
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry, October 1, 2002; 10(5): 503 - 505.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ALL ISSUES SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry